I am Free...
Monday, 27 January 2020
Bonafede (Goodfaith) and bad faith - by Marco Travaglio
THE VIDEO RELATED IS IN THE ORIGINAL SITE:
IL FATTO QUOTIDIANO
| 26 JANUARY 2020
First of all, an important correction with the ash-covered head. Yesterday I wrote that who does not want to give salvini also Emilia Romagna and Calabria, and soon all Italy, can use the split vote: vote the list you prefer and then delete the name of the governor candidate who has the best chance of beating the right-wing one. That is, bonaccini in Emilia Romagna and callipo in Calabria. I confirm this for Emilia Romagna, but not for Calabria, whose electoral law does not allow the split vote: there those who practice it cancel the card. In Calabria, who wants to vote callipo must choose a list connected to him and not, for example, those of the 5stars.
Now, correct my mistake, I would like to take care of the one made by Justice Minister Alfonso bonafede the other night to Otto and a half. A Republic journalist, unaware of twenty years of battles by her newspaper to block the statute of limitations, challenged the statute of limitations: “you don’t think of the innocent who end up in prison?”. A dementia argument, since the lockout-prescription does not change the fate of possible innocent people in prison. They cannot be prisoners who expiate their sentences, that is, those who are ultimately sentenced, by definition guilty. But the prisoners in pre-trial detention (arrested before the sentence on the basis of“grave clues of guilt” to prevent them from fleeing or polluting the evidence or reiterating the crime): that, however, for our Constitution, are already presumed innocent”. So there is nothing outrageous if a presumed innocent“is in prison: it is the law that provides for it. Only the final verdict will tell whether he was guilty or innocent. In the meantime, even those who have been caught in the act, or have confessed, or have been photographed or filmed or intercepted while committing the crime, are still presumed innocent. However, if he is arrested, the length of pre-trial detention does not depend on the statute of limitations, but on the time limits laid down by law for each stage and stage of the trial. If the trial lasts too long, the defendant will also come out in the future for starting terms (which the law bonafede does not even touch). Of course, without
On appeal, anyone who was able to get away with the first sentence will now be able to go back to jail until a final sentence and, if convicted, remain there to atone for the sentence. But it is anything but innocent. For custody you need“serious clues of guilt”. And the judges declare the crime prescribed only if they believe that the accused is not innocent: otherwise, by law, they must absolve him, having nothing to prescribe.
The statute of limitations during the trial is reserved for the guilty parties. In fact, those who consider themselves innocent can renounce it in order to obtain absolution beyond the deadlines and, if it is declared by the judge, can challenge it in order to seek absolution. Therefore the argument“innocents in prison” there is nothing to do with the lockout-prescription, which does not send anyone innocent to prison. It only serves to throw it into caciara, as when we spoke of the scandals of B. and his servants shouted: “And the foibe? And Cuba? And Stalin? And Pol Pot?”. Amazed by such an absurd objection, bonafede answers: “What about the innocent who end up in prison? The innocent do not end up in prison…”. Without adding what his sentence implies: “…with the lockout-prescription”. When the journalist then reminds him of the compensated prisoners, he immediately dissolves the quiproquo: “Ah ok, that is another matter and in fact I am the minister who most of all sent inspectors to check cases of unjust detention”. If the debate were between competent people and in good faith, the misunderstanding would close there. Instead the usual political-media canea is unleashed about the alleged gaffe
While the lawyer lobbies ask for his head and the lawyers accidentally mock him on the newspapers by dragging Enzo tortora, that is, by pretending not to understand or not understanding at all.
At this point it is perhaps necessary to clarify once and for all the concept of innocent/guilty. That is not at all equivalent to convicted/acquitted. The innocent is the one who did not commit the crime, the guilty is the one who committed it. But if one is innocent or guilty, only he knows, but he cannot judge himself. So, from what world it is, judges are delegated to evaluate any testimony and evidence, regulated by precise limits. Their sentence (acquittal, or conviction, or prescription) is a pure convention: except in very rare cases, they can never photograph the whole“historical truth”, but only analyse the usable elements collected, that is“judicial truth”. In this convention, accepted by all in order to prevent the victims from taking justice into their own hands, it is stipulated that a very probable culprit is acquitted because the evidence is not sufficient for the judge to convict him. And in Italy, a certain culprit is not convicted because it has been too long.
For the Constitution, even those who know they are guilty and have gotten away with it for lack of evidence (which he was good at hiding) or by statute of limitations (which was good at triggering, being discovered after years or making the process last to infinity), is“innocent”. This does not mean that he has been wrongfully detained, or that his trial is a miscarriage of justice or that he has seen the wrong person. The world and especially Italy are full of innocents by law but guilty in the facts, and no one knows it better than they do. The most common miscarriages of justice are not the arrests and convictions of innocent people (always possible, in fallible human justice): they are the release and acquittal of the guilty.
IL FATTO QUOTIDIANO
| 26 JANUARY 2020
First of all, an important correction with the ash-covered head. Yesterday I wrote that who does not want to give salvini also Emilia Romagna and Calabria, and soon all Italy, can use the split vote: vote the list you prefer and then delete the name of the governor candidate who has the best chance of beating the right-wing one. That is, bonaccini in Emilia Romagna and callipo in Calabria. I confirm this for Emilia Romagna, but not for Calabria, whose electoral law does not allow the split vote: there those who practice it cancel the card. In Calabria, who wants to vote callipo must choose a list connected to him and not, for example, those of the 5stars.
Now, correct my mistake, I would like to take care of the one made by Justice Minister Alfonso bonafede the other night to Otto and a half. A Republic journalist, unaware of twenty years of battles by her newspaper to block the statute of limitations, challenged the statute of limitations: “you don’t think of the innocent who end up in prison?”. A dementia argument, since the lockout-prescription does not change the fate of possible innocent people in prison. They cannot be prisoners who expiate their sentences, that is, those who are ultimately sentenced, by definition guilty. But the prisoners in pre-trial detention (arrested before the sentence on the basis of“grave clues of guilt” to prevent them from fleeing or polluting the evidence or reiterating the crime): that, however, for our Constitution, are already presumed innocent”. So there is nothing outrageous if a presumed innocent“is in prison: it is the law that provides for it. Only the final verdict will tell whether he was guilty or innocent. In the meantime, even those who have been caught in the act, or have confessed, or have been photographed or filmed or intercepted while committing the crime, are still presumed innocent. However, if he is arrested, the length of pre-trial detention does not depend on the statute of limitations, but on the time limits laid down by law for each stage and stage of the trial. If the trial lasts too long, the defendant will also come out in the future for starting terms (which the law bonafede does not even touch). Of course, without
On appeal, anyone who was able to get away with the first sentence will now be able to go back to jail until a final sentence and, if convicted, remain there to atone for the sentence. But it is anything but innocent. For custody you need“serious clues of guilt”. And the judges declare the crime prescribed only if they believe that the accused is not innocent: otherwise, by law, they must absolve him, having nothing to prescribe.
The statute of limitations during the trial is reserved for the guilty parties. In fact, those who consider themselves innocent can renounce it in order to obtain absolution beyond the deadlines and, if it is declared by the judge, can challenge it in order to seek absolution. Therefore the argument“innocents in prison” there is nothing to do with the lockout-prescription, which does not send anyone innocent to prison. It only serves to throw it into caciara, as when we spoke of the scandals of B. and his servants shouted: “And the foibe? And Cuba? And Stalin? And Pol Pot?”. Amazed by such an absurd objection, bonafede answers: “What about the innocent who end up in prison? The innocent do not end up in prison…”. Without adding what his sentence implies: “…with the lockout-prescription”. When the journalist then reminds him of the compensated prisoners, he immediately dissolves the quiproquo: “Ah ok, that is another matter and in fact I am the minister who most of all sent inspectors to check cases of unjust detention”. If the debate were between competent people and in good faith, the misunderstanding would close there. Instead the usual political-media canea is unleashed about the alleged gaffe
While the lawyer lobbies ask for his head and the lawyers accidentally mock him on the newspapers by dragging Enzo tortora, that is, by pretending not to understand or not understanding at all.
At this point it is perhaps necessary to clarify once and for all the concept of innocent/guilty. That is not at all equivalent to convicted/acquitted. The innocent is the one who did not commit the crime, the guilty is the one who committed it. But if one is innocent or guilty, only he knows, but he cannot judge himself. So, from what world it is, judges are delegated to evaluate any testimony and evidence, regulated by precise limits. Their sentence (acquittal, or conviction, or prescription) is a pure convention: except in very rare cases, they can never photograph the whole“historical truth”, but only analyse the usable elements collected, that is“judicial truth”. In this convention, accepted by all in order to prevent the victims from taking justice into their own hands, it is stipulated that a very probable culprit is acquitted because the evidence is not sufficient for the judge to convict him. And in Italy, a certain culprit is not convicted because it has been too long.
For the Constitution, even those who know they are guilty and have gotten away with it for lack of evidence (which he was good at hiding) or by statute of limitations (which was good at triggering, being discovered after years or making the process last to infinity), is“innocent”. This does not mean that he has been wrongfully detained, or that his trial is a miscarriage of justice or that he has seen the wrong person. The world and especially Italy are full of innocents by law but guilty in the facts, and no one knows it better than they do. The most common miscarriages of justice are not the arrests and convictions of innocent people (always possible, in fallible human justice): they are the release and acquittal of the guilty.
Sunday, 26 January 2020
The Library of Congress Makes Thousands of Fabulous Photos, Posters & Images Free to Use & Reuse https://t.co/cTl3CODdmX pic.twitter.com/hcPjPuehTk— Open Culture (@openculture) January 26, 2020
Saturday, 25 January 2020
This sculpture looks like water suspended in the air pic.twitter.com/LyXFVbf39J— Mashable (@mashable) January 25, 2020
Impressive 🙌 pic.twitter.com/2fkCiz3rw1
— Unexpected Videos (@unexpectedvid) January 24, 2020
MAKKOX IN ENGLISH!!! - Matteo Salvini, I suppose...
- are you a pusher?
- zot!
- then what it’s like to evolve and become human?
- I’ll tell you what, it is nice...
but it’s not for everyone
MAKKOX - STAY ANIMAL
PROPAGANDA LIVE
I have the author's permission
to devastate his work.
if someone feel the urge to help
is welcome (very)...
I have the author's permission
to devastate his work.
if someone feel the urge to help
is welcome (very)...
Friday, 24 January 2020
MAKKOX IN ENGLISH!!! - Matteo Salvini
- Hi, are you a pusher?
- But wasn’t it enough to fast? I understand that one have to help with the legal costs of this process, but...
- Ma'am! um... we’re live on the web! then people believe it...
- shit...
- did you hear?
- it's all true
- the intercom said so
MAKKOX - IT'S THE DOMOTIC, BABY...
Il Foglio
I have the author's permission
to devastate his work.
if someone feel the urge to help
is welcome (very)...
I have the author's permission
to devastate his work.
if someone feel the urge to help
is welcome (very)...
Popular Posts LAST 30 DAYS
- The future of retail is powered by machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, smart robotics), extended reality (AR/V...
- Tutorials, blogger challenges, beautiful destinations, fashion, home & decor + loads of pretty pictures can be found from the blog...
-
- Klaus Holzkamp - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Holzkamp Klaus Holzkamp worked as a professor at the Free University of Berl...
- of course you already know THE MATRIX - TRAILERS JUST IN CASE... critical psycology - I need it(I own this book) Klaus...
- The Music, Books & Films Liberated into the Public Domain in 2020. Rhapsody in Blue, The Magic Mountain, Sherlock, Jr., and More ht...
-
- "Palermo #tram and square rock 2019 ". A live music review on our trams to promote the culture of common goods, public mobility...
- music by Denard Henry Listen to Sonic Seekers at Surfer’s Bay VIP - Dj mix by Denard Henry by SWU on hearthis.at ...
- NICE PLACE, ANYWAY... LOL https://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Yumix%20Prada/116/87/32 Listen to Monday Nights - Strange Waves...
Thursday, 23 January 2020
click on the photo to go live
SecondLife is live! https://t.co/1yzR0zPkBE— Second Life Official (@SecondLife) January 23, 2020
Thor Heyerdahl -documentary 1950, film trailer and books
Fatu-Hiva - Back to Nature is a book published in 1974 by archaeologist and explorer Thor Heyerdahl detailing his experiences and reflections during a one-and-a-half-year stay on the Marquesan island of Fatu Hiva in 1937-38. The book was based on Heyerdahl's original report Paa Jakt efter Paradiset, which was published in Norway in 1938, but because of the outbreak of World War II was never translated and rather forgotten... keep reading in the original site
Popular Posts LAST WEEK
- The future of retail is powered by machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, smart robotics), extended reality (AR/V...
It seems that I have problems with the video music... you tube block same people videoS when there is same copyrighted music. it says one...- The Bolt Connection from TheBoltConnection on Vimeo .
- ROCCO PAPALEO MUSIC CHANNEL here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtIcOeieAfgXhiFvFSJ_bfA
- My mother give me a hundred lire that in America I want to go My mother give me a hundred lire that in America I want to go My mother ...
MAKKOX - do not ask what Giorgio Gori can do for you, but ask yourself what you can do for... ;-) MAKKOX Il Foglio I ha...-
- https://community.secondlife.com/blogs/entry/946-get-the-new-materials-viewer-today/ https://secondlife.com/support/downloads/
- The Teslasuit incorporates haptic feedback, motion capture and biometrics to accelerate and improve the body’s movements, reflexes and ...
FOR EXAMPLE I AM A BLOGER :-DDDD Tutorials, blogger challenges, beautiful destinations, fashion, home & decor + loads of pre...
Wednesday, 22 January 2020
visiting the biggest boat - video - link - music
https://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Galaxy%20FORWARD/147/170/49
Music by Delirix from Fugue
thanks to https://icons8.com/
and Lazy River Rag by dan Lebowitz
more music (just in case)
MAKKOX IN ENGLISH!!! - Matteo Salvini
- But have you put enough pictures of cats?
- in the referendum question? all right!
- and they rejected it
- yes
- caciocavallo cheese?
- three
- what the he... but then it is not a political fault
MAKKOX - the riddle of the beast
i HAVE A NEW FRIEND - he writes mails to me
 | discobot January 21 |
Hey @IAMFREE, just checking in because I haven’t heard from you in a while.
- To continue, reply to me any time.
- If you’d like to skip this step, say
skip. - To start over, say
start new user.
If you’d rather not, that’s OK too. I’m a robot. You won’t hurt my feelings. 
Visit Message to respond to discobot, IAMFREE.
This is a fangtooth, also known as ogrefish 🐟 it’s only been spotted a few times in decades of ocean research. pic.twitter.com/Vn71NyHNKW— Naturism.Com (@NaturismC) January 22, 2020
Tuesday, 21 January 2020
New Babbage - Great Exhibition
LINK TO THE INFOS
https://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Blackberry%20Fields/123/96/3204
FREE'S SURVEY IN THE AREA
The Crystal Palace was a cast-iron and plate-glass structure originally built in Hyde Park, London, to house the Great Exhibition of 1851. The exhibition took place from 1 May until 15 October 1851, and more than 14,000 exhibitors from around the world gathered in its 990,000 square feet (92,000 m2) exhibition space to display examples of technology developed in the Industrial Revolution. Designed by Joseph Paxton,... KEEP READING IN THE ORIGINAL SITE
Monday, 20 January 2020
internet experience (sgrunt)
Meravigliosa 💙 https://t.co/0gtQhdAe02— insopportabile (@insopportabile) January 20, 2020
Power of your mind. You can change the direction just by thinking about it ......... pic.twitter.com/xaVn0rBIDq— Physics & Astronomy Zone🔭 (@ZonePhysics) January 19, 2020
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)